The Case for Faculty Status

A Comparative Study of Academic Librarians and Faculty in Philippine Higher Education

Authors

  • Dridge Paul Reyes UP School of Library and Information Studies

Keywords:

academic librarians, faculty status, job satisfaction, compensation, higher education

Abstract

This study examines the professional profiles, compensation, and job satisfaction of academic librarians in the Philippines, comparing these to non-librarian faculty (NLFs) within private higher education institutions. Using an exploratory quantitative approach, the research highlights disparities in income, benefits, and research output between librarians and their faculty counterparts. Findings reveal that while librarians demonstrate strong academic credentials and a commitment to professional development, systemic barriers such as limited institutional support and the lack of faculty status hinder their professional growth and job satisfaction.

The study underscores the need for institutional reforms to address these disparities, advocating for the recognition of librarians as faculty members. A focus on equitable compensation, access to research opportunities, and professional development resources is critical to ensuring that librarians can fully contribute to the academic community. These insights inform policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the professional standing and satisfaction of academic librarians in the Philippines.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Reyes, D. P. (2026). The Case for Faculty Status: A Comparative Study of Academic Librarians and Faculty in Philippine Higher Education. Philippine Journal of Librarianship and Information Studies, 44(2), 12–26. Retrieved from https://phjlis.org/index.php/phjlis/article/view/192

Issue

Section

Articles